VAR Referee's Controversial Gesture in Germany-Curacao Match Sparks Outrage, FIFA Investigates
A gesture by VAR referee Shaun Evans, interpreted as a 'White Power' symbol during the Germany vs. Curacao match in the 2026 World Cup, has triggered widespread condemnation, and FIFA has opened a formal investigation, confronting football with intolerance.

Foto: BOOM 💥 Photography / Pexels (https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-holding-red-card-12659337/)
The Gesture That Has Shocked the World Cup
The 2026 World Cup has become the scene of an unexpected and profound controversy that transcends the purely sporting. During the broadcast of the match between Germany and Curacao, which ended with a resounding 7-1 victory for Germany, the VAR referee, Australian Shaun Evans, was captured by cameras making a hand gesture that has unleashed a wave of global outrage. This gesture, known as the 'inverted OK' or the 'circle game', has been interpreted by various anti-discrimination organisations as a sign associated with white supremacy and far-right movements, leading FIFA to initiate a formal investigation.
Photo: Gene Gallin / Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/@genefoto)
The image, which quickly went viral on social media and in the news, shows Evans making the sign with his right hand, thumb and index finger touching while the other fingers remain extended. While for some it might seem harmless or a simple game, its adoption by extremist sectors has transformed its meaning, turning it into a symbol of hate and discrimination.
A Symbol Under Global Scrutiny
Photo: Omar Ramadan / Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/@omarvellous14)
The duality of the gesture is precisely what makes it so complex and dangerous on a stage of global visibility like the World Cup. While in certain contexts it can mean 'all good' or be part of a children's game, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has included this sign in its database of hate symbols, explicitly linking it to white supremacist groups. The media exposure of the event, one of the most watched globally, exponentially amplifies the impact of any act or gesture, however subtle it may seem.
In a sport that prides itself on its universality and its ability to unite cultures, the appearance of a symbol with such connotations is a direct blow to its fundamental values. Football, described by FIFA as a universal force for diversity, is forced to reaffirm its commitment against any form of racism and discrimination.
FIFA's Firm Stance and Potential Consequences
Given the magnitude of the controversy and the formal calls for his removal, FIFA has reacted forcefully, confirming that the incident is under review and that an investigation has been opened against Shaun Evans. The demand for his expulsion from the tournament has been one of the main reactions, reflecting the football community's intolerance towards any manifestation of discrimination.
FIFA's stance against racism is 'zero tolerance' and has been reinforced with a 'Global Stance Against Racism' approved in May 2024. This initiative includes strict regulations and sanctions, the implementation of a three-step procedure to stop and suspend matches in case of discriminatory incidents, and the introduction of a universal normative gesture for players and referees to communicate racist acts. Furthermore, the FIFA Disciplinary Code was amended in 2025 to include more rigorous sanctions for discriminatory conduct, which can range from suspensions of at least ten matches to an automatic loss of a game. The organisation has also implemented a protocol for reporting racist acts, which involves a specific gesture with crossed arms forming an 'X'.
The world football governing body has made it clear that racism and discrimination are not only unethical but are crimes. The investigation into Evans' gesture will assess the context of the image and the referee's record before any definitive action, but sensitivity and vigilance are extremely high at events of this magnitude.
VAR at the Centre of the Controversy
Paradoxically, this incident puts the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system, a tool designed to ensure fairness and transparency in the game, under the spotlight. Attention, instead of focusing on the impartiality of technology-assisted refereeing decisions, now shifts to the personal conduct of one of its operators. The expectation of neutrality and impartiality is paramount for the refereeing body, and any action that casts doubt on it undermines the credibility of the system as a whole.
A Clear Message Against Discrimination
This incident underscores football's constant battle against discrimination in all its forms. FIFA's response and the widespread condemnation demonstrate that there is no place for racism or hate symbols in sport. It is a reminder that the fight against intolerance requires constant vigilance, decisive action, and an unwavering commitment to the education and values of respect and inclusion that football aspires to represent worldwide. Sport, at its highest level, must be a reflection of society's noblest values.